Asus P7H55-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics63.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P7H55-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110104
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJun 15 '17 at 23:09
Run Duration416 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 72.9
2-Core 151
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 371
36% 297 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Asus(1043 8518) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
63.1% Good
Lighting 80.1
Reflection 81.7
Parallax 72.8
65% 78.2 fps
MRender 78.9
Gravity 73.5
Splatting 66
59% 72.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 40GB
36GB free
Firmware: 2CV102HD Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
25.7% Poor
Read 178
Write 40.7
Mixed 64.7
20% 94.6 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 39.7
4K Mixed 4.34
53% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 21
DQ Write 38.8
DQ Mixed 7.78
12% 22.5 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 36%
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z22000RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.7% Below average
Read 221
Write 191
Mixed 199
45% 204 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 46.4
4K Mixed 2.34
58% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 26.5
DQ Write 89.2
DQ Mixed 2.29
18% 39.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 78%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129
2TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 137
Write 112
Mixed 102
88% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 2.39
4K Mixed 0.23
98% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 99%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
829GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 107
Write 77.3
Mixed 51.3
58% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.19
66% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
349GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 90.7
Write 88.1
Mixed 20.3
48% 66.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.19
69% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 67%
Imation Nano Pro II 8GB
4GB free, PID 0726
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
5.31% Terrible
Read 21.6
Write 4.25
Mixed 7.28
11% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.24
4K Write 0.004
4K Mixed 0.005
20% 1.75 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.31%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
37% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 10
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7H55-M PRO Builds (Compare 417 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $326
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback