Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	17.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	MSI MS-7A46
Motherboard	MSI B150M BAZOOKA PLUS (MS-7A46) (all builds)
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180703
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 17 '21 at 18:18
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	42%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500-$67 241,476 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	63% Good	Memory 73.4 1-Core 96.2 2-Core 188 68% 119 Pts	4-Core 310 8-Core 282 40% 296 Pts	64-Core 345 21% 345 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 85B1) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	53.2% Above average	Lighting 65.3 Reflection 68 Parallax 63.4 53% 65.6 fps	MRender 65.5 Gravity 68.4 Splatting 62.3 53% 65.4 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 126GB free (System drive) Firmware: B1D2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 73 115 33 93 39 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	17.4% Very poor	Read 80.2 Write 80.6 Mixed 75.8 SusWrite 63.4 17% 75 MB/s	4K Read 9.9 4K Write 11.5 4K Mixed 8.1 32% 9.83 MB/s	DQ Read 16.7 DQ Write 17.4 DQ Mixed 14.4 12% 16.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 100%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 124GB free Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 297 312 313 313 340 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Read 314 Write 288 Mixed 355 SusWrite 320 72% 319 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 62.2 4K Mixed 20.8 97% 36 MB/s	DQ Read 362 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 352 262% 348 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 124%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB 4,649 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 28GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 26 47 28 19 20 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	23.8% Poor	Read 85 Write 30.2 Mixed 44.5 SusWrite 30.3 56% 47.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 2.1 130% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BL8G32C16U4BL.M8FE1 2x8GB 2,437 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.7% Below average	MC Read 12.8 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 12.2 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 9.3 SC Mixed 8.1 25% 8.6 GB/s	Latency 93.8 43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 108%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	20x
SD8SBBU120G1122 120GBSandiskBench 47%, 2,087 samples	19x
Fury 240GBHyperX $193Bench 71%, 27,826 samples	18x

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	50x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	21x
PSD44G213381 2x4GBPatriotBench 71%, 1,250 samples	14x

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $197

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16