Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	24.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E6500-$91 5,942 User benchmarks, average bench 39% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	25.6% Poor	Memory 40.7 1-Core 40 2-Core 68.6 30% 49.8 Pts	4-Core 63.5 8-Core 56.3 8% 59.9 Pts	64-Core 46.6 3% 46.6 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 45%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 SATA M.2 256GB 2,150 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 210GB free (System drive) Firmware: X231906 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 38 40 47 49 56 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.4% Poor	Read 106 Write 130 Mixed 78.1 SusWrite 45.3 20% 89.6 MB/s	4K Read 9.4 4K Write 21.7 4K Mixed 16.8 47% 16 MB/s	DQ Read 28.5 DQ Write 71.7 DQ Mixed 27.9 28% 42.7 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 95%
Toshiba MG06ACA800E 8TB 291 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 5.5TB free Firmware: 0104 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 51 55 57 59 92 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	46.4% Average	Read 100 Write 121 Mixed 50.1 SusWrite 61 61% 83.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 125% 1 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 132%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	13.8% Very poor	MC Read 5.2 MC Write 5 MC Mixed 4.1 14% 4.77 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 3.4 10% 3.33 GB/s	Latency 199 20% 199 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 31%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium D 2.80GHzIntelBench 29%, 3,782 samples	2x
Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $150Bench 45%, 18,432 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	2x
GeForce 9400 GTNvidiaBench 1%, 12,718 samples	1x

SSD
SHFR200240G 240GBKingstonBench 83%, 2,078 samples	1x
Fury 120GBHyperX $160Bench 64%, 11,403 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16