Asrock B75M-DGS R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics36.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock B75M-DGS R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131001
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '17 at 13:47
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Memory 85.7
1-Core 65
2-Core 97.7
54% 82.8 Pts
4-Core 101
8-Core 118
14% 110 Pts
64-Core 87.3
5% 87.3 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 375.95
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Lighting 47.6
Reflection 31.7
Parallax 39.2
39% 39.5 fps
MRender 39.4
Gravity 42.5
Splatting 37
32% 39.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
367GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 147
Write 141
Mixed 22.6
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.04
4K Write 2.17
4K Mixed 0.23
110% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 108%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
311GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 102
Write 99.9
Mixed 60.7
65% 87.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 2.32
4K Mixed 0.55
123% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 58%
Great: 75%
Innostor Innostor 64GB
35GB free, PID 0903
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 33.2
Write 23.7
Mixed 5.55
23% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.69
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.2
22% 1.31 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Team-Elite-1600 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30.8% Below average
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 5.2
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 4.4
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75M-DGS R2.0 Builds (Compare 190 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B75M-DGS R2.0 - $79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $179
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback