Asus P8H77-M LE

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	44.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H77-M LE (all builds)
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120528
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 16 '21 at 10:43
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	81.5% Excellent	Memory 94.5 1-Core 102 2-Core 179 75% 125 Pts	4-Core 374 8-Core 515 56% 444 Pts	64-Core 517 32% 517 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Nvidia(10DE 1F82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	44.9% Average	Lighting 56 Reflection 82 Parallax 52.2 46% 63.4 fps	MRender 65.9 Gravity 50.5 Splatting 46.2 43% 54.2 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 155 154 150 144 133 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	72% Very good	Read 399 Write 391 Mixed 320 SusWrite 173 72% 321 MB/s	4K Read 34.2 4K Write 56.6 4K Mixed 41.4 135% 44.1 MB/s	DQ Read 41.8 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 54.7 47% 66.2 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 124%
PNY SSD2SC120GC1DA16T-T 120GB 108 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 61GB free Firmware: 502ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 115 115 114 112 112 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	43.7% Average	Read 315 Write 110 Mixed 137 SusWrite 111 37% 168 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 16.9 4K Mixed 20.1 76% 21.4 MB/s	DQ Read 32.1 DQ Write 18.6 DQ Mixed 22.8 18% 24.5 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 80%
Maxtor 6L200M0 204GB-$44 1,500 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1GB free Firmware: BANC1E00 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 28.3 Write 33 Mixed 21.7 21% 27.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.3 108% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 35%
Maxtor 6L200M0 204GB-$44 1,500 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 2GB free Firmware: BANC1E00 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 57.2 Write 61.5 Mixed 37.5 39% 52.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 0.5 144% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 35%
WD Elements 2621 2TB 11,378 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1.5TB free, PID 2621 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 113 115 114 110 112 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	Read 104 Write 104 Mixed 64.5 SusWrite 111 130% 95.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.3 162% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 43,127 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 20.7 MC Mixed 18.8 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 16.9 SC Mixed 17.8 49% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 58.6 68% 58.6 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H77-M LE Builds (Compare 761 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M LE

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	158x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	124x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	50x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	67x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	58x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	31x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	47x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	25x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	18x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	32x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	21x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16