Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	98.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E-2286M 989 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	88.9% Excellent	Memory 79 1-Core 142 2-Core 268 89% 163 Pts	4-Core 530 8-Core 926 88% 728 Pts	64-Core 1,111 69% 1,111 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 98%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000 1,190 User benchmarks, average bench 96% HP(103C 860C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 452.25 Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	98.1% Outstanding	Lighting 118 Reflection 146 Parallax 128 96% 131 fps	MRender 143 Gravity 117 Splatting 117 102% 126 fps
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 98.1% Great: 108%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kxg60znv512g KIOXIA 512GB 6,082 User benchmarks, average bench 192% 345GB free (System drive) Firmware: AGHA4101 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,318 Write 1,421 Mixed 1,169 291% 1,303 MB/s	4K Read 32.5 4K Write 68.7 4K Mixed 44.7 143% 48.6 MB/s	DQ Read 710 DQ Write 1089 DQ Mixed 875 669% 891 MB/s
Poor: 121% Great: 247%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMAA4GS6MJR8N-VK 2x31.5GB 267 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76.5% Very good	MC Read 28.4 MC Write 29.7 MC Mixed 23.4 78% 27.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 32.6 SC Mixed 24.3 70% 24.5 GB/s	Latency 82.4 48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 86%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	227x
Quadro RTX 3000NvidiaBench 67%, 3,632 samples	116x
Quadro RTX 5000NvidiaBench 96%, 1,190 samples	78x

SSD
KIOXIA 512GBKxg60znv512gBench 192%, 6,082 samples	62x
PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G-1006 512GBWDCBench 199%, 3,035 samples	56x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TBSamsungBench 264%, 8,018 samples	53x

RAM
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 82%, 20,439 samples	83x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	37x
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 2x16GBHynixBench 81%, 4,947 samples	30x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16