Fujitsu CELSIUS W520 POWER

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	96.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS W520 POWER (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3167-A1
Memory	14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141201
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 15 '21 at 17:42
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1275 V2-$400 461 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	67.8% Good	Memory 84.1 1-Core 108 2-Core 216 77% 136 Pts	4-Core 278 8-Core 520 48% 399 Pts	64-Core 520 32% 520 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Device(0000 0000) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.30 Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Lighting 17.2 Reflection 19.5 Parallax 13.2 14% 16.6 fps	MRender 22.3 Gravity 16.7 Splatting 15.2 14% 18.1 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$54 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 406GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR033 SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 430 447 441 371 362 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	96.3% Outstanding	Read 390 Write 335 Mixed 331 SusWrite 409 83% 367 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 76.5 4K Mixed 37.2 139% 49.1 MB/s	DQ Read 240 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 215 184% 267 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 96.3% Great: 125%
WD WD3200AVJS-63WDA0 320GB 7,100 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 298GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 105 105 106 105 106 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Read 105 Write 99.8 Mixed 63.4 SusWrite 104 68% 93.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 177% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 59%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 146 144 147 147 146 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Read 136 Write 130 Mixed 70.5 SusWrite 145 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391B5273DH0-YK0 4x4GB 161 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	56.2% Above average	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 19.5 MC Mixed 17.6 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 18.1 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 73.3 54% 73.3 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS W520 POWER Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W520 POWER

CPU
Xeon E3-1230 V2Intel $266Bench 70%, 8,235 samples	47x
Xeon E3-1225 V2Intel $200Bench 70%, 2,869 samples	14x
Xeon E3-1275 V2Intel $400Bench 74%, 461 samples	13x

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	17x
T600NvidiaBench 29%, 1,270 samples	8x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	7x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
MX500 500GBCrucial $54Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	5x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-YK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 56%, 161 samples	7x
HMT451U6BFR8A-PB Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 HMT451U6BFR8A-PB Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 24GBHynixBench 54%, 16 samples	6x
M378B1G73QH0-CK0 16GBSamsungBench 52%, 199 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $706

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16