| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 32.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P5N32-E SLI PLUS (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20070822 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 15 '21 at 17:19 |
| Run Duration | 134 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 62% |
PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
38%
Below average
|
32% 46.3 Pts
|
14% 108 Pts
|
7% 108 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Zotac(19DA 1375) 2GB
CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
32.9%
Below average
|
34% 41.8 fps
|
30% 37.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z220
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 148 158 173 182 185 MB/s
|
38.7%
Below average
|
39% 174 MB/s
|
63% 24.1 MB/s
|
22% 42.5 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
326GB free
Firmware: 12.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 2 2 2.1 2.5 2.5 MB/s
|
21.2%
Poor
|
15% 20.3 MB/s
|
185% 1.37 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
|
13.4%
Very poor
|
12% 4.1 GB/s
|
11% 4 GB/s
|
30% 134 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5N32-E SLI PLUS Builds (Compare 9 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5N32-E SLI PLUS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 3x |
| Core2 Duo E8600Intel $180Bench 44%, 6,109 samples | 1x |
| Core2 Duo E6850Intel $57Bench 40%, 4,150 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 285NvidiaBench 9%, 2,842 samples | 2x |
| GTX 560Nvidia $180Bench 14%, 23,273 samples | 1x |
| GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $100 |