Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	41.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	4.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190715
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Feb 15 '21 at 09:05
Run Duration	120 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	53%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700F-$295 54,980 User benchmarks, average bench 92% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	84.8% Excellent	Memory 80.3 1-Core 122 2-Core 247 82% 150 Pts	4-Core 479 8-Core 794 78% 637 Pts	64-Core 700 43% 700 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% MSI(1462 3750) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.5% Average	Lighting 53.8 Reflection 34.9 Parallax 33.7 44% 40.8 fps	MRender 76.4 Gravity 37.4 Splatting 29.9 37% 47.9 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
NFS011SA324-6007000 240GB 514 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0212B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 264 53 57 44 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	45% Average	Read 407 Write 374 Mixed 18.9 SusWrite 130 52% 233 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 20.6 66% 16.4 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 98%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB 64,984 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 678GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 162 99 109 82 98 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Read 178 Write 160 Mixed 108 SusWrite 118 104% 141 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.4 84% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata 2x8GB 24,552 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	60.9% Good	MC Read 24.3 MC Write 22.1 MC Mixed 19.5 63% 22 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 19.1 SC Mixed 16.2 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 79.9 50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i7-9700FIntel $295Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	1,616x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,215x
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	177x

GPU
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	832x
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	480x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	428x

SSD
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	297x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	217x
AS340 240GBApacerBench 71%, 10,970 samples	142x

RAM
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	361x
D12.2356WS.001 2x8GBApacerBench 81%, 464 samples	171x
D12.2324CS.001 2x8GBApacerBench 80%, 469 samples	162x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $438

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16