Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Silver N5030 2,697 User benchmarks, average bench 35% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	24.4% Poor	Memory 31.9 1-Core 33.9 2-Core 77.7 27% 47.8 Pts	4-Core 98.5 8-Core 100 13% 99.3 Pts	64-Core 101 6% 101 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605 14,651 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 85F5) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	0.77% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 0.9 Parallax 1 1% 0.97 fps	MRender 0.7 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 1 1% 0.8 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.77% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLH256HAJD-000H1 256GB 372 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 172GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT22H0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 202 191 169 199 194 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	Read 287 Write 285 Mixed 250 SusWrite 207 58% 257 MB/s	4K Read 15.8 4K Write 36.4 4K Mixed 21.6 71% 24.6 MB/s	DQ Read 191 DQ Write 159 DQ Mixed 163 126% 171 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMSA3260NA78HAF-2666 1x8GB 4,752 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 5.2 15% 5.1 GB/s	SC Read 0.9 SC Write 1.2 SC Mixed 2.1 4% 1.4 GB/s	Latency 244 16% 244 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 110,580 samples	426x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 1,390 samples	49x
MX130NvidiaBench 9%, 14,117 samples	39x

SSD
SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GBIntelBench 147%, 27,018 samples	44x
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples	42x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GBWDCBench 152%, 17,295 samples	18x

RAM
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GBMicronBench 38%, 20,126 samples	65x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	39x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	37x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16