Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	10.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	27.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3220-$79 71,790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	59.1% Above average	Memory 89.4 1-Core 54.3 2-Core 102 54% 82 Pts	4-Core 169 8-Core 173 23% 171 Pts	64-Core 158 10% 158 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170 16,214 User benchmarks, average bench 11% HP(103C 1098) 2GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.09 Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Lighting 13.1 Reflection 20.7 Parallax 11.9 11% 15.2 fps	MRender 11.2 Gravity 13.5 Splatting 14.6 11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 11%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Colorful SL300 160GB 355 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0616B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 231 104 37 44 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	27.2% Poor	Read 298 Write 267 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 76.9 37% 167 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 10.7 4K Mixed 1 30% 8.93 MB/s	DQ Read 95.7 DQ Write 21.4 DQ Mixed 6 18% 41 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 1x4GB 8,533 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	33% Below average	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 9.9 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 10.7 28% 9.7 GB/s	Latency 68 59% 68 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16