Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240 23,506 User benchmarks, average bench 57% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	53.6% Above average	Memory 72.9 1-Core 51.5 2-Core 100 47% 74.8 Pts	4-Core 187 8-Core 270 29% 228 Pts	64-Core 273 17% 273 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% EVGA(3842 3757) CLim: 1463 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Lighting 24.9 Reflection 20.1 Parallax 23.1 20% 22.7 fps	MRender 26.9 Gravity 26.1 Splatting 18.8 19% 23.9 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 143GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1Z4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 113 117 36 45 18 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26.3% Poor	Read 247 Write 207 Mixed 219 SusWrite 59.2 41% 183 MB/s	4K Read 30.1 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.3 49% 11.8 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 102%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37 50,270 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 217GB free Firmware: 18.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 114 118 34 50 15 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	Read 116 Write 113 Mixed 65.7 SusWrite 60.2 65% 88.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 70%
Seagate BUP Slim 2TB 10,173 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1.5TB free Firmware: 1707 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 28 28 28 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Read 25.2 Write 27.9 Mixed 25.7 SusWrite 27.7 20% 26.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5474-016.A00LF 99U5474-016.A00LF CT102464BD160B.M16 99[1/6/8/3]995(S)0 20GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	27.5% Poor	MC Read 11 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 10.7 27% 9.43 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 8.1 19% 6.53 GB/s	Latency 94.8 42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon II X4 645AMDBench 46%, 5,346 samples	9x
Phenom II X6 1045TAMD $165Bench 54%, 5,709 samples	1x
Athlon II X4 630AMDBench 45%, 7,197 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples	4x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	2x
GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $300Bench 59%, 180,577 samples	2x

SSD
SSD 240GBBench 75%, 38,401 samples	1x

RAM
16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 6GBMicronBench 36%, 29 samples	2x
9905403-893.A00LF 9905402-669.A00LF F3-1600C9-4GAO F3-1600C9-4GAO 20GBKingstonBench 19%, 3 samples	2x
M378B5273CH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 54%, 4,484 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16