| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 65.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus F1A75-M PRO (all builds) |
| Memory | 5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120206 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 13 '21 at 04:18 |
| Run Duration | 135 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 35% |
PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
39.2%
Below average
|
38% 62.5 Pts
|
19% 143 Pts
|
10% 164 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
126%
Outstanding
|
132% 189 fps
|
131% 164 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial M500 480GB-$84
412GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 273 289 296 280 307 MB/s
|
65.7%
Good
|
68% 301 MB/s
|
79% 28.8 MB/s
|
140% 212 MB/s
|
|
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB
11GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
|
12.2%
Very poor
|
16% 14.2 MB/s
|
144% 3.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905471-011.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
33.3%
Below average
|
36% 12.5 GB/s
|
18% 6.33 GB/s
|
28% 144 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical F1A75-M PRO Builds (Compare 39 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus F1A75-M PRO - $80
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A8-3870 APUAMD $81Bench 47%, 6,332 samples | 19x |
| A8-3850 APUAMD $80Bench 46%, 3,108 samples | 10x |
| A6-3650 APUAMDBench 44%, 2,748 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 6550DAMDBench 4%, 4,197 samples | 4x |
| GTX 650-TiNvidia $152Bench 14%, 36,698 samples | 3x |
| Radeon HD 6530DAMDBench 3%, 4,675 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $161 |