Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 10% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (92%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba Satellite Click W35Dt-A (all builds)
Motherboard	AMD Larne
Memory	1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140314
Uptime	3.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 13 '21 at 01:31
Run Duration	181 Seconds
Run User	BOL-User
Background CPU	92%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-1200 APU 480 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Memory 17.5 1-Core 10.3 2-Core 15.4 10% 14.4 Pts	4-Core 20.7 8-Core 23.1 3% 21.9 Pts	64-Core 24.8 2% 24.8 Pts
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 25%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8180 474 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FAE1) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 16.12.2 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	0.63% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 0.7 0% 0.97 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 1.9 1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.63% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD WD5000M21K-60JU6T0 500GB 111 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 429GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 88 75 27 57 83 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	28.8% Poor	Read 41 Write 39.2 Mixed 16 SusWrite 59.4 28% 38.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 68% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-G7 1x4GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	9.15% Terrible	MC Read 3.6 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 3.8 10% 3.37 GB/s	SC Read 0.9 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 1 4% 1.43 GB/s	Latency 339 12% 339 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.15% Great: 10%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16