Asus P8Z77-V PRO/THUNDERBOLT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V PRO/THUNDERBOLT  (all builds)
Memory21.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130813
Uptime7.9 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '21 at 10:58
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 94.3
1-Core 126
2-Core 249
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 626
60% 492 Pts
64-Core 616
38% 616 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Asus(1043 0525) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51% Above average
Lighting 64.6
Reflection 61.3
Parallax 88.4
53% 71.4 fps
MRender 61.9
Gravity 70.8
Splatting 46.6
48% 59.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,791
Write 1,655
Mixed 800
313% 1,415 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 50.5
167% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 650
DQ Write 520
DQ Mixed 523
408% 564 MB/s
Poor: 159% Great: 353%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
30GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 40 32 34 33 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 458
Write 402
Mixed 400
SusWrite 77.1
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 94.9
4K Mixed 42.3
151% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 232
211% 321 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 118%
WD Re 2TB (2012)-$29
1GB free
Firmware: 01.01K02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4
Write 15.8
Mixed 12.7
8% 10.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 90%
WD Green 750GB (2009)-$224
55GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 63 63 54 59 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 53
Write 57.5
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 60
39% 52.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 58%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 13.5TB
850GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 20 2.1 19 4.6 12 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 165
Write 30.2
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 13.5
48% 65.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.3
107% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 96%
Samsung M3 Portable 500GB
9GB free, PID 61b3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 33
Write 28.2
Mixed 26
SusWrite 28
38% 28.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
43% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-559.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/8GX KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.1% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 17.2
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 18
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 59
68% 59 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V PRO/THUNDERBOLT Builds (Compare 157 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V PRO/THUNDERBOLT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $401
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback