PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 6.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 70.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock 980DE3/U3S3 (all builds) |
Memory | 9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150904 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Feb 12 '21 at 07:46 |
Run Duration | 217 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
56.9%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R7 240
Device(1B0A 90C4) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.2.2
|
6.32%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 195 193 186 187 186 MB/s
|
70.9%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$16
70GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 49 49 47 49 49 MB/s
|
26.8%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
955GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 68 74 70 73 79 MB/s
|
36.7%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
361GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 96 97 92 96 96 MB/s
|
56%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
71GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 67 73 70 73 79 MB/s
|
52.5%
Above average
|
|||
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB-$59
127GB free
Firmware: PB3OC60F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 58 58 56 58 58 MB/s
|
33.7%
Below average
|
|||
USB DISK 3.0 124GB
44GB free, PID 6000
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 58 58 33 55 64 MB/s
|
63.2%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G CT102464BA160B.C16 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
46%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 49x |
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 30x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 22x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 17x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 12x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $220 |