Packard EasyNote TE11BZ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop 16%
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPackard EasyNote TE11BZ  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130219
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '21 at 17:57
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD E1-1200 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
17% Very poor
Memory 29.3
1-Core 18.4
2-Core 27.3
17% 25 Pts
4-Core 27.3
8-Core 31.3
4% 29.3 Pts
64-Core 7.4
0% 7.4 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310
Acer(1025 0690) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
0.62% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.27 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.4
0% 1.2 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.62%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB-$49
432GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 32 28 36 27 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
23.1% Poor
Read 50.5
Write 46.1
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 29.7
27% 36.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
62% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston ACR256X64D3S13C9G HMT451S6MFR8C-PB 6GB
667, 800 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
8.1% Terrible
MC Read 2.4
MC Write 3
MC Mixed 3.3
8% 2.9 GB/s
SC Read 0.4
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 0.4
2% 0.87 GB/s
Latency 259
16% 259 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 8.1%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical EasyNote TE11BZ Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 25%
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TE11BZ

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $96SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback