PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock FM2A58M-DG3+ (all builds) |
Memory | 6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20150511 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Feb 11 '21 at 17:54 |
Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
Run User | POL-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
51.4%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 3681) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 361.43
|
17.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$34
576GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 124 136 159 170 170 MB/s
|
86.7%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Portable 500GB
51GB free, PID 2332
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 27 31 31 30 MB/s
|
14.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
25.2%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples | 7x |
Athlon X4 840 Quad CoreAMDBench 45%, 4,588 samples | 3x |
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples | 3x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples | 5x |
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 2x |
GTX 560Nvidia $180Bench 14%, 23,273 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 51% - Above average | Total price: $80 |