MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B79
Motherboard	MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) (all builds)
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191106
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 11 '21 at 17:30
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	89.4% Excellent	Memory 74.4 1-Core 142 2-Core 296 90% 171 Pts	4-Core 561 8-Core 841 87% 701 Pts	64-Core 1,060 66% 1,060 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85CD) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.1% Poor	Lighting 36.8 Reflection 40 Parallax 38 30% 38.3 fps	MRender 37.3 Gravity 39.9 Splatting 0.2 18% 25.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 260GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 86 104 122 123 76 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Read 176 Write 168 Mixed 72 SusWrite 104 95% 130 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80 31,610 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 66GB free Firmware: 3.AAK SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 68 69 68 68 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	41.3% Average	Read 75.5 Write 52.7 Mixed 42.4 SusWrite 68.1 44% 59.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 43%
Sony Storage Media 16GB 1,582 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 12GB free, PID 05ba Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.7 5 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	4.95% Terrible	Read 17.3 Write 2.2 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 4.7 8% 7.35 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 22% 2 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.95% Great: 8%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 2GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 2GB free, PID 1608 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 5.8 6.1 6.1 6.1 6 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	6.43% Terrible	Read 21 Write 5.5 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 6 11% 9.8 MB/s	4K Read 8.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 33% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.43% Great: 8%
General UDisk 32GB 1,993 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 26GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 3.6 1.7 9.1 11 9.9 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	9.47% Terrible	Read 30.6 Write 8.4 Mixed 0.2 SusWrite 7.3 11% 11.6 MB/s	4K Read 14.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 54% 4.87 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 9.47% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD2 2x8GB 16,539 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.9% Very good	MC Read 30.8 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 30.4 75% 26.4 GB/s	SC Read 22.8 SC Write 16.8 SC Mixed 30.3 67% 23.3 GB/s	Latency 91.7 44% 91.7 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,906 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	1,392x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	683x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $153Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	328x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	283x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	280x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	272x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	131x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	121x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	121x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	366x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	155x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	146x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $487

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)