Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	64.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-5005U 50,603 User benchmarks, average bench 38% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	Memory 84.6 1-Core 54.8 2-Core 98.3 52% 79.2 Pts	4-Core 164 8-Core 169 22% 166 Pts	64-Core 153 10% 153 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 52%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GSSD230S 256GB 3,887 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 209GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02J0T6OC SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 135 119 134 139 140 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Read 440 Write 264 Mixed 298 SusWrite 149 64% 288 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 49.4 4K Mixed 28.4 92% 32.3 MB/s	DQ Read 180 DQ Write 233 DQ Mixed 113 112% 176 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GB 51,191 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	29.7% Poor	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 10.2 MC Mixed 8.4 28% 9.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 8.1 SC Mixed 8.8 22% 7.87 GB/s	Latency 72.5 55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-6200UIntelBench 41%, 135,462 samples	164x
Core i3-5005UIntelBench 38%, 50,603 samples	27x
Celeron N3050IntelBench 19%, 14,457 samples	23x

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	160x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	44x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	26x

SSD
MZNLF128HCHP-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 46%, 3,641 samples	12x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	8x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	6x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	36x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	18x
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 27%, 39,427 samples	16x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16