Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive136% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GM
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200619
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '21 at 09:46
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Memory 66
1-Core 51.2
2-Core 105
46% 74.1 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 428
37% 314 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1391) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6446
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
2.75% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 40.2
Parallax 3.5
2% 15.6 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 3.1
Splatting 4.7
3% 4 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.75%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 770 632 593 614 609 579 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 1,140
Write 1361
Mixed 928
SusWrite 633
228% 1,016 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 30.2
97% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 536
DQ Write 407
DQ Mixed 439
337% 461 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 136%
Great: 340%
WD My Passport 2TB
645GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
8.33% Terrible
Read 16.2
Write 20.8
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 20.3
26% 18.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 8.33%
Great: 44%
WD Game Drive 12TB
1.5TB free, PID 263a
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 121 110 117 117 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 111
Write 124
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 118
136% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
69% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 116%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 128GB
58GB free, PID a212
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 38 40 40 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 40
Write 40
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 39.2
52% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.2
79% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
36.5% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 11.4
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 8.7
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM Builds (Compare 1,213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback