Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200527
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '21 at 07:23
Run Duration299 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 150
2-Core 299
100% 181 Pts
4-Core 565
8-Core 1,141
100% 853 Pts
64-Core 1,168
72% 1,168 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 101%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
49% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 60
Parallax 60
49% 60 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60
Splatting 60
49% 60 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 49%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 219 219 215 214 212 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 481
Mixed 392
SusWrite 239
90% 403 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 91.7
4K Mixed 54.1
182% 62.6 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 352
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 107%
Great: 124%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$74
248GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2054 1724 1709 1725 1727 1724 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
334% Outstanding
Read 2,009
Write 2,284
Mixed 1770
SusWrite 1777
442% 1,960 MB/s
4K Read 50.5
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 73.8
266% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,654
DQ Write 1,198
DQ Mixed 1,480
1,091% 1,444 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 334%
Great: 347%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$74
213GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1758 1707 1715 1709 1713 1702 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
330% Outstanding
Read 1,997
Write 2,243
Mixed 1,783
SusWrite 1,717
436% 1,935 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 73.4
252% 93.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,684
DQ Write 1,351
DQ Mixed 1,516
1,135% 1,517 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 330%
Great: 347%
WD WD10JPLX-00MBPT0 1TB
865GB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 126 128 127 126 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 138
Write 124
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 127
74% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
116% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 76%
Great: 75%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
739GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 153 155 155 155 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 148
Write 146
Mixed 87.7
SusWrite 154
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 40.9
MC Write 44.9
MC Mixed 29.2
110% 38.3 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 46.2
SC Mixed 31.1
93% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 54.8
73% 54.8 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 7,441 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $787
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback