Asrock X99M Killer/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics164% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X99M Killer/3.1  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160325
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '21 at 06:09
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 25.5 GHz, turbo 25.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
54% Above average
Memory 82.9
1-Core 107
2-Core 143
68% 111 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 148
20% 149 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 54%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
164% Outstanding
Lighting 223
Reflection 212
Parallax 268
182% 234 fps
MRender 272
Gravity 228
Splatting 166
176% 222 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 164%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
38GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,163
Write 1,959
Mixed 1,463
414% 1,862 MB/s
4K Read 50.6
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 63.9
213% 72.6 MB/s
DQ Read 739
DQ Write 376
DQ Mixed 576
423% 564 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 178 181 186 184 178 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 439
Mixed 358
SusWrite 196
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 83.9
4K Mixed 47.3
161% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 352
258% 340 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 124%
Toshiba MK6475GSX 640GB-$66
569GB free
Firmware: GT001M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 84 84 84 84 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 76.3
Write 77.4
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 83.4
47% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 45%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2017)-$83
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 170 171 161 157 154 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 124
Write 129
Mixed 68
SusWrite 162
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.6
205% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
37.7% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 12.8
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 13.9
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99M Killer/3.1 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99M Killer/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $591
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback