Asus H61M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive60% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H61M-K  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '21 at 22:17
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1220 V2-$305
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 83.7
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 180
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 336
31% 257 Pts
64-Core 288
18% 288 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 175
Parallax 187
133% 175 fps
MRender 126
Gravity 175
Splatting 123
114% 141 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 121%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 182 213 228 215 212 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60% Good
Read 226
Write 211
Mixed 196
SusWrite 202
47% 209 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 46.9
4K Mixed 28
96% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 163
132% 186 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 60%
Great: 124%
Hua721010kla330 43W7625 42C0400IBM 1TB
358GB free
Firmware: GKAOAB4A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 63 63 62 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 66.9
Write 66.8
Mixed 43.9
SusWrite 62.2
44% 60 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 47%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
90GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 90 90 90 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 83.9
Write 84.5
Mixed 34.1
SusWrite 89.1
97% 72.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
51.7% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.9
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 15.2
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-K Builds (Compare 2,319 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-K - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $227
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback