Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	19.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B93
Motherboard	MSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93) (all builds)
Memory	118.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210105
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 06 '21 at 20:04
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$249 60,132 User benchmarks, average bench 99% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	91% Outstanding	Memory 60.3 1-Core 162 2-Core 324 94% 182 Pts	4-Core 650 8-Core 1,180 110% 915 Pts	64-Core 2,230 138% 2,230 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 91% Great: 108%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325 82,117 User benchmarks, average bench 50% Asus(1043 04DD) CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.11.2 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	19.3% Very poor	Lighting 7.2 Reflection 75.2 Parallax 86.4 6% 56.3 fps	MRender 65.4 Gravity 60.2 Splatting 45.5 46% 57 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 102 101 100 102 100 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	80.8% Excellent	Read 500 Write 140 Mixed 215 SusWrite 102 52% 239 MB/s	4K Read 34 4K Write 85.2 4K Mixed 41.9 150% 53.7 MB/s	DQ Read 222 DQ Write 143 DQ Mixed 198 143% 188 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 124%
OCZ Vertex 460 120GB-$200 1,011 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 111GB free Firmware: 1.03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 353 339 354 338 354 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	87.9% Excellent	Read 455 Write 353 Mixed 315 SusWrite 348 82% 368 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 86.3 4K Mixed 33.7 125% 48 MB/s	DQ Read 254 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 214 162% 219 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 87.9% Great: 100%
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34 18,767 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 105GB free Firmware: 0002SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 43 43 42 43 43 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	26.2% Poor	Read 48.5 Write 51.5 Mixed 32.1 SusWrite 42.6 32% 43.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BL32G36C16U4B.M16FB1 4x31.8GB 81 User benchmarks, average bench 131% 4 of 4 slots used 127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	89% Excellent	MC Read 40.6 MC Write 29.6 MC Mixed 29 94% 33.1 GB/s	SC Read 24.1 SC Write 25 SC Mixed 27.3 73% 25.5 GB/s	Latency 127 32% 127 ns
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 160%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 161%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 162%

UFO

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	429x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	351x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	324x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	369x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $104Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	318x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	213x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	197x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	126x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	124x

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $920

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16