Razer Blade Stealth 13 (Early 2020) - RZ09-0310

Performance Results


Gaming 106% UFO	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 88% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	141% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	156% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 86% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Razer Blade Stealth 13 (Early 2020) - RZ09-0310 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer LY325
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201119
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Feb 06 '21 at 16:29
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%
CPU Throttled	86%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-1065G7 58,314 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	72.7% Very good	Memory 67.8 1-Core 116 2-Core 251 77% 145 Pts	4-Core 421 8-Core 579 63% 500 Pts	64-Core 473 29% 473 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 70%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel Iris Plus G7 52,498 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Device(1A58 1003) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9079 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	8.93% Terrible	Lighting 16.6 Reflection 16.9 Parallax 17.4 14% 17 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.93% Great: 13%
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	141% Outstanding	Lighting 173 Reflection 253 Parallax 182 141% 203 fps	MRender 248 Gravity 220 Splatting 169 169% 212 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 141% Great: 174%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CA5-8D512 512GB 1,283 User benchmarks, average bench 181% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: CQ20901 SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 197 182 213 193 202 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	156% Outstanding	Read 1,489 Write 167 Mixed 170 SusWrite 197 108% 506 MB/s	4K Read 35.8 4K Write 117 4K Mixed 51.3 182% 68 MB/s	DQ Read 1,064 DQ Write 215 DQ Mixed 289 302% 522 MB/s
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 156% Great: 261%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K4UBE3D4AA-MGCL 2x8GB 7,828 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3733 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	MC Read 46.9 MC Write 46.8 MC Mixed 40.5 128% 44.7 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 37.2 SC Mixed 28 79% 27.8 GB/s	Latency 107 38% 107 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Stealth 13 (Early 2020) - RZ09-0310 Builds (Compare 298 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 15%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade Stealth 13 (Early 2020) - RZ09-0310

CPU
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples	298x

GPU
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	163x
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 38%, 3,536 samples	104x
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples	3x

SSD
CA5-8D512 512GBNvmeBench 171%, 2,452 samples	92x
CA5-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 181%, 1,283 samples	65x
MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GBSamsungBench 231%, 4,252 samples	59x

RAM
K4UBE3D4AA-MGCL 2x8GBSamsungBench 104%, 7,828 samples	242x
2x8GBMicronBench 83%, 3,676 samples	56x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16