Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 97% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 73% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	16.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110211
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 06 '21 at 05:22
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	57%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74.5% Very good	Memory 89 1-Core 95 2-Core 186 72% 123 Pts	4-Core 350 8-Core 343 46% 346 Pts	64-Core 352 22% 352 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 3752) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	132% Outstanding	Lighting 182 Reflection 192 Parallax 195 148% 190 fps	MRender 138 Gravity 190 Splatting 129 123% 153 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 132% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 132GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 293 292 297 297 297 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 479 Write 457 Mixed 392 SusWrite 307 92% 409 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 80.4 4K Mixed 52.5 161% 55.6 MB/s	DQ Read 389 DQ Write 351 DQ Mixed 367 276% 369 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 124%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 110GB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 104 104 104 104 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Read 115 Write 30.5 Mixed 64.8 SusWrite 104 58% 78.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 0.8 172% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 72%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 14GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 75 66 71 72 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Read 86.2 Write 86.5 Mixed 79.2 SusWrite 75.9 61% 81.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 131% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 5GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 71 74 81 81 75 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	43.7% Average	Read 77.2 Write 77.7 Mixed 58.5 SusWrite 74.7 53% 72 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 83%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79 133,734 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 69GB free Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 120 118 121 120 121 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	58.9% Above average	Read 83.7 Write 120 Mixed 29.3 SusWrite 120 64% 88.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 2 367% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston SRT4G86U1-H9H F3-10666CL9-4GBXL V01D3LF4GB26826813 20GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	49.9% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 16 49% 17 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 15.9 SC Mixed 16.3 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 68.5 58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 949 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	156x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	120x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	116x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	73x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	48x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	45x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	33x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	22x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	20x

RAM
Performance DDR3 1333 C9 4x2GBG.SKILLBench 47%, 77 samples	12x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	9x
99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 7,477 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $225

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16