Asus PRIME X570-P

Performance Results


Gaming 114% UFO	Desktop 106% UFO	Workstation 103% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	288% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X570-P (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201124
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 05 '21 at 08:21
Run Duration	280 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$151 383,420 User benchmarks, average bench 96% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Memory 88.6 1-Core 160 2-Core 319 102% 189 Pts	4-Core 629 8-Core 905 96% 767 Pts	64-Core 1,150 71% 1,150 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 107%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% EVGA(3842 6686) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Lighting 137 Reflection 214 Parallax 131 112% 160 fps	MRender 118 Gravity 142 Splatting 118 103% 126 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 1TB 16,136 User benchmarks, average bench 283% 249GB free (System drive) Firmware: 32B3T8EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 1432 912 709 719 724 704 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	288% Outstanding	Read 2,705 Write 1,912 Mixed 1,640 SusWrite 867 396% 1,781 MB/s	4K Read 61.1 4K Write 148 4K Mixed 83.5 278% 97.6 MB/s	DQ Read 998 DQ Write 803 DQ Mixed 255 367% 685 MB/s
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 288% Great: 373%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 50GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 244 211 170 150 140 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	96% Outstanding	Read 492 Write 447 Mixed 402 SusWrite 215 87% 389 MB/s	4K Read 40.6 4K Write 82.2 4K Mixed 52.8 173% 58.5 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 201 151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 96% Great: 134%
Team TM8PS7256G 256GB 5,014 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 52GB free Firmware: S1022A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 68 34 28 29 29 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	67.7% Good	Read 478 Write 401 Mixed 373 SusWrite 67 74% 330 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 78.4 4K Mixed 28.8 122% 45.4 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 176 DQ Mixed 47.3 69% 128 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 100%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 635GB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 122 125 125 126 125 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	65.5% Good	Read 104 Write 103 Mixed 21.8 SusWrite 124 64% 88.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 108%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB-$71 11,382 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 582GB free Firmware: MKAOAA10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 100 101 102 101 101 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	61.1% Good	Read 113 Write 113 Mixed 81.7 SusWrite 100 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 87%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB 3,459 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 17GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 46 12 25 25 25 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	30.2% Below average	Read 146 Write 58.2 Mixed 76.2 SusWrite 32.3 91% 78 MB/s	4K Read 6.2 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 2.2 105% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 48%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB 18,744 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 555GB free, PID 0820 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 47 47 47 48 47 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	26.4% Poor	Read 72 Write 72.5 Mixed 46 SusWrite 47.1 78% 59.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 42%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB 31,309 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 752GB free, PID 25e1 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 68 69 68 69 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	48% Average	Read 131 Write 108 Mixed 72.3 SusWrite 68.4 122% 94.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.3 168% 2 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB 44,547 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	MC Read 45.5 MC Write 27 MC Mixed 39.5 107% 37.3 GB/s	SC Read 30.4 SC Write 27.1 SC Mixed 40 93% 32.5 GB/s	Latency 69 58% 69 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 116%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X570-P Builds (Compare 7,955 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-P

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,593x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $80Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	1,201x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $151Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	902x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	698x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	491x
RX 5700-XTAMD $199Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	470x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	308x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	255x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	216x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	286x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	222x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	161x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $737

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16