| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 82.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1400 x 1050 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20200716 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 04 '21 at 23:03 |
| Run Duration | 151 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
81.4%
Excellent
|
78% 140 Pts
|
74% 609 Pts
|
58% 938 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.4%
Below average
|
24% 54.4 fps
|
42% 51 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 220 221 218 284 226 MB/s
|
82.2%
Excellent
|
66% 298 MB/s
|
137% 47.9 MB/s
|
103% 152 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 500GB (2016)-$30
465GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 198 201 203 199 199 MB/s
|
116%
Outstanding
|
121% 166 MB/s
|
161% 1.1 MB/s
| |
|
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
559GB free, PID 7000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 116 115 111 113 115 MB/s
|
56.8%
Above average
|
140% 106 MB/s
|
164% 1.97 MB/s
| |
|
Multiple Flash Reader 32GB
26GB free, PID 6361
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 19 18 MB/s
|
15.5%
Very poor
|
20% 15.1 MB/s
|
205% 3.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown R748G2606U2S-U 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
95.9%
Outstanding
|
100% 34.9 GB/s
|
82% 28.9 GB/s
|
47% 84.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 5,984 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 867x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 715x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 543x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 454x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 423x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 402x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $358 |