Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP300E5X-A02AE
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130220
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Feb 04 '21 at 20:36
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron B820 3,353 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	29.6% Poor	Memory 50.3 1-Core 40 2-Core 44.1 31% 44.8 Pts	4-Core 56.8 8-Core 42.3 7% 49.5 Pts	64-Core 65.5 4% 65.5 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz) 45,735 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sanyo(144D C652) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	0.48% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 0.9 Parallax 0.9 0% 0.73 fps	MRender 1.1 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 1 1% 0.93 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.48% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 342GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 100 145 170 198 173 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.4% Poor	Read 91 Write 74.7 Mixed 108 SusWrite 156 24% 107 MB/s	4K Read 6.6 4K Write 20.7 4K Mixed 5.4 28% 10.9 MB/s	DQ Read 64.6 DQ Write 71.4 DQ Mixed 81.1 57% 72.4 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KBG/4G Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	24% Poor	MC Read 10.3 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 8.9 25% 8.6 GB/s	SC Read 4.7 SC Write 7 SC Mixed 5.6 16% 5.77 GB/s	Latency 160 25% 160 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C Builds (Compare 1,054 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C

CPU
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	348x
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	151x
Core i3-2328MIntelBench 47%, 7,778 samples	93x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	500x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	247x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	200x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	46x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	25x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	21x

RAM
AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 1x4GBAdataBench 30%, 1,080 samples	71x
AD73I1C1674EV 1x4GBAdataBench 25%, 5,119 samples	24x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 3,287 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $80

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $183	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16