Asrock FM2A88X-ITX+

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A88X-ITX+ (all builds)
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140117
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 04 '21 at 15:30
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	72%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD PRO A10-8750B R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G 537 User benchmarks, average bench 44% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	28.3% Poor	Memory 44.5 1-Core 19.4 2-Core 44.2 24% 36 Pts	4-Core 71.4 8-Core 73.1 10% 72.2 Pts	64-Core 79.4 5% 79.4 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 25,284 User benchmarks, average bench 6% ASRock(1849 130F) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.11.2 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.84% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 3.1 Parallax 0.5 0% 1.33 fps	MRender 4.6 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 2 2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 0.84% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: 506ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 144 156 154 156 148 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	Read 324 Write 169 Mixed 197 SusWrite 153 47% 211 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 43.7 4K Mixed 26.1 93% 31.4 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 144 115% 159 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 87%
BUFFALO External HDD 1.5TB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 557GB free, PID 0105 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Read 34.8 Write 23.8 Mixed 32.9 SusWrite 36.7 43% 32 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 22%
ASMT 2105 1TB 1,332 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 168GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 27 27 27 27 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Read 26.8 Write 23.2 Mixed 22.4 SusWrite 26.3 33% 24.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB 8,627 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	27.6% Poor	MC Read 12 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 11.6 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 8.3 18% 6.2 GB/s	Latency 182 22% 182 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A88X-ITX+ Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88X-ITX+ - $125

CPU
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	13x
A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 45%, 11,026 samples	5x
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	5x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	9x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	3x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	3x

SSD
INTENSO 256GBBench 72%, 4,055 samples	4x
SU650 480GBAdata $89Bench 69%, 17,796 samples	3x
hynix SH920 mSATA 256GBSKBench 70%, 756 samples	2x

RAM
Ripjaws DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 52%, 16,472 samples	4x
R934G2130U1S 2x4GBAMDBench 49%, 208 samples	4x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $260

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16