Asus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Yacht	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	50.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3 (all builds)
Memory	3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120217
Uptime	9 Days
Run Date	Feb 03 '21 at 20:28
Run Duration	233 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	84.3% Excellent	Memory 93.6 1-Core 116 2-Core 224 83% 145 Pts	4-Core 405 8-Core 583 62% 494 Pts	64-Core 585 36% 585 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Sapphire(174B E347) CLim: 1342 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.12.1 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	50.2% Above average	Lighting 63.3 Reflection 62.9 Parallax 84.3 52% 70.2 fps	MRender 65 Gravity 67.5 Splatting 46.8 48% 59.8 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 260GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 269 270 270 270 266 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	83.9% Excellent	Read 466 Write 267 Mixed 264 SusWrite 271 71% 317 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 86.4 4K Mixed 24.9 114% 45.2 MB/s	DQ Read 370 DQ Write 282 DQ Mixed 195 181% 282 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 129%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 153GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 136 137 136 135 138 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	68.3% Good	Read 102 Write 95.8 Mixed 62.1 SusWrite 136 72% 98.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 186% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 85%
Seagate Basic 5TB 840 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 4TB free Firmware: 9340 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 28.4 Write 22.7 Mixed 25.9 SusWrite 12.4 17% 22.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 0.6 156% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 65%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 49,966 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1.5TB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 27.8 Write 24.9 Mixed 24.6 SusWrite 12.3 17% 22.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.3 114% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 67%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB-$7 7,617 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 51GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 9.4 9.3 8.6 8.5 8.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 31.7 Write 16.7 Mixed 19.7 SusWrite 9 24% 19.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1.4 126% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 40%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB 1,122 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 647GB free, PID 0237 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Read 31.6 Write 24.6 Mixed 19.9 SusWrite 19.8 31% 24 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 43%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 4,068 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 281GB free, PID a006 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Read 32.3 Write 22.9 Mixed 21 SusWrite 19.6 31% 23.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 43%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB 578 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 3TB free, PID 61b7 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 111 116 116 118 111 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	51.3% Above average	Read 89.2 Write 97.5 Mixed 68.1 SusWrite 113 127% 91.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.6 174% 2 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-439.A00LF 2x4GB 2,460 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	52.7% Above average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 16.3 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 19.1 SC Mixed 17.9 49% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 60.7 66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z68-V PRO GEN3 Builds (Compare 1,479 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3 - $390

CPU
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	433x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	318x
Core i7-2700KIntel $89Bench 73%, 20,692 samples	173x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	102x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	93x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	83x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	60x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	49x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	48x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	95x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	58x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	55x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $1,018

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16