Asus K72Jr

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus K72Jr (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK K72Jr
Memory	3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100906
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 02 '21 at 19:54
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130 18,336 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	42.7% Average	Memory 62 1-Core 64 2-Core 92.6 46% 72.9 Pts	4-Core 136 8-Core 144 19% 140 Pts	64-Core 155 10% 155 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470 14,621 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 1BF2) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.19% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 2.9 Parallax 1.9 1% 2.07 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 2 1% 1.53 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.19% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso SSD 128GB 1,375 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0522A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 192 198 219 227 227 MB/s Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47.7% Average	Read 218 Write 202 Mixed 207 SusWrite 209 47% 209 MB/s	4K Read 14.7 4K Write 39.3 4K Mixed 16.7 64% 23.6 MB/s	DQ Read 140 DQ Write 156 DQ Mixed 36.8 58% 111 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 91%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB 14,782 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 11GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 20.5 Write 10.2 Mixed 4.2 12% 11.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 10% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.7% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 10.2 24% 8.3 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 5.6 16% 5.43 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical K72Jr Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus K72Jr

CPU
Core i3 M 350Intel $199Bench 38%, 14,351 samples	23x
Core i5 M 460Intel $130Bench 40%, 18,336 samples	23x
Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples	9x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	82x
Mobility Radeon HD 5000 Series (Engineering Sample - WDDM v1.20)ATIBench 1%, 62 samples	1x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	4x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	3x

RAM
AD73I1B1672EG 2x2GBAdataBench 25%, 997 samples	9x
EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F 2x2GBUnknownBench 27%, 753 samples	8x
HMT125S6BFR8C-G7 2x2GBHynixBench 24%, 1,873 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 40% - Below average

Total price: $227

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16