Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results


Gaming 160% UFO	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 181% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	203% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210118
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 01 '21 at 23:12
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	79.2% Very good	Memory 83 1-Core 145 2-Core 290 93% 173 Pts	4-Core 405 8-Core 777 70% 591 Pts	64-Core 1,933 120% 1,933 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,306 158,856 User benchmarks, average bench 210% Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	203% Outstanding	Lighting 300 Reflection 252 Parallax 305 244% 286 fps	MRender 341 Gravity 246 Splatting 177 199% 254 fps
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 203% Great: 230%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB 30,033 User benchmarks, average bench 192% 583GB free (System drive) Firmware: RKT3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 760 103 243 61 278 113 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 73% Great: 305%
Mushkin Striker 480GB-$200 239 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 189GB free Firmware: SAFM SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 311 361 261 341 358 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Read 364 Write 415 Mixed 312 SusWrite 323 80% 354 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 52 4K Mixed 21.9 79% 29.9 MB/s	DQ Read 76.6 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 44.2 58% 100 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 106%
WD Black 5TB (2015)-$71 7,245 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 124 125 124 123 125 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	76.3% Very good	Read 140 Write 180 Mixed 89 SusWrite 125 98% 134 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1.1 288% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB 1,656 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	MC Read 47.6 MC Write 40.3 MC Mixed 43.8 125% 43.9 GB/s	SC Read 19.9 SC Write 25.1 SC Mixed 30.8 72% 25.3 GB/s	Latency 75.1 53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 140%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,025 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $550

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,161x
Ryzen 9 5950XAMD $416Bench 100%, 33,026 samples	869x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	869x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	608x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	528x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	489x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	479x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	311x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $168Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	212x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	290x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	158x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 106%, 11,505 samples	94x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,805

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16