Gigabyte GA-Z68AP-D3

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	43.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z68AP-D3 (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366x768x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120321
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Feb 01 '21 at 08:13
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$197 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Memory 92.2 1-Core 95.9 2-Core 186 74% 125 Pts	4-Core 298 8-Core 469 47% 384 Pts	64-Core 468 29% 468 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Sapphire(1DA2 E343) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.1.1 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.1% Average	Lighting 53.8 Reflection 57.6 Parallax 75.2 44% 62.2 fps	MRender 55.7 Gravity 57.6 Splatting 43.1 42% 52.1 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71F1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 51 52 51 53 54 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.9% Poor	Read 211 Write 100 Mixed 84.8 SusWrite 81.1 26% 119 MB/s	4K Read 15 4K Write 21.2 4K Mixed 10.9 48% 15.7 MB/s	DQ Read 22.2 DQ Write 24.9 DQ Mixed 22.2 17% 23.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 85%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 603GB free Firmware: MS2OA8R0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 148 165 165 165 164 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	89.8% Excellent	Read 154 Write 159 Mixed 31.9 SusWrite 159 91% 126 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 107%
Samsung HD253GJ 250GB 4,131 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 90GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 11 9.1 9.8 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	22.8% Poor	Read 68.8 Write 12.5 Mixed 12.8 SusWrite 10.5 19% 26.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.4 77% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	49.4% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 15.3 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 17.2 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 63.7 63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z68AP-D3 Builds (Compare 1,352 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z68AP-D3

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	365x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	237x
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	166x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	102x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	94x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	88x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	41x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	36x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	27x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	385x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	289x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	168x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $474

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16