Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150901
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '21 at 22:24
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 74.2
2-Core 147
63% 102 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 472
46% 371 Pts
64-Core 470
32% 470 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$400
Device(4D50 4449) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 173
Reflection 164
Parallax 155
140% 164 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 131
Splatting 115
112% 142 fps
Poor: 118%
This bench: 127%
Great: 142%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$265
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 244 243 245 246 246 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 463
Write 440
Mixed 375
SusWrite 238
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 67.6
4K Mixed 34.6
117% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 256
191% 254 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 99%
Team T253X2001T 1TB
83GB free
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 294 378 281 101 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 497
Write 400
Mixed 357
SusWrite 221
82% 369 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 76.7
4K Mixed 24.4
111% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 37.8
73% 144 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 106%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$33
439GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 67 65 67 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 75.7
Write 73
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 66.3
50% 67.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.6% Average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 16
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.5
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 3,920 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $316
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $320Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $95SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback