ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 838F
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180523
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 31 '21 at 20:13
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	Memory 84.2 1-Core 101 2-Core 198 74% 128 Pts	4-Core 362 8-Core 569 57% 465 Pts	64-Core 584 36% 584 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630 310,249 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 838F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4771 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	5.49% Terrible	Lighting 6.2 Reflection 4.1 Parallax 6.5 5% 5.6 fps	MRender 5.9 Gravity 6.3 Splatting 10 6% 7.4 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.49% Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile) 105,856 User benchmarks, average bench 29% HP(103C 838F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.41 Performing below potential (75^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.7% Poor	Lighting 37.6 Reflection 38.9 Parallax 37.6 31% 38 fps	MRender 37.4 Gravity 40.4 Splatting 26.8 28% 34.9 fps
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GB 8,655 User benchmarks, average bench 176% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB73H1Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,628 Write 736 Mixed 578 214% 980 MB/s	4K Read 53.3 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 66.2 227% 78.6 MB/s	DQ Read 861 DQ Write 758 DQ Mixed 701 555% 773 MB/s
Poor: 101% Great: 317%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 474GB free Firmware: JB0OA3T0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 120 117 117 117 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	67.5% Good	Read 118 Write 108 Mixed 21.1 SusWrite 118 66% 91.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 135% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GB 42,779 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	40.3% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 11.2 38% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 13.5 SC Mixed 12.3 35% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 73.2 55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx Builds (Compare 3,157 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	2,233x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	923x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 72%, 1 sample	1x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	1,278x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	743x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	737x

SSD
MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 8,655 samples	283x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsung $171Bench 177%, 99,566 samples	255x
CA1-8D128-HP 128GBLiteonBench 117%, 4,097 samples	153x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	340x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	298x
HP26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 2,916 samples	175x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060 $305	Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12400F $149	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $299	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $199	Nvidia RTX 3060 $290	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $50	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $357	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback