Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-450 APU 9,307 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	Memory 73 1-Core 20 2-Core 33.4 33% 42.1 Pts	4-Core 38.5 8-Core 36.6 5% 37.5 Pts	64-Core 38.2 2% 38.2 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 39%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40 17,642 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 135GB free (System drive) Firmware: ES2ZB90A SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 56 47 58 57 54 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	Read 59.8 Write 53.8 Mixed 28.4 SusWrite 53.6 36% 48.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.2 47% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 1x2GB 2,805 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.6% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 4.2 11% 4 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 3.7 8% 2.9 GB/s	Latency 94.5 42% 94.5 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 22%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

RAM
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	2x
HB3SU004GFM8MML16 1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 150 samples	1x
MAGNUMTECH 1x4GBUnknownBench 19%, 210 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16