| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
| Graphics | 1.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
| System | Packard EN Butterfly s (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Packard EN Butterfly s |
| Memory | 5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20100804 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 29 '21 at 21:10 |
| Run Duration | 134 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5 U 470
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
|
28.9%
Poor
|
32% 51.8 Pts
|
13% 99.3 Pts
|
6% 101 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce 310M
Acer(1025 041C) 512MB
Driver: Ver. 21.21.13.4201
|
1.39%
Terrible
|
1% 0.97 fps
|
2% 2.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 199 195 201 194 195 MB/s
|
49.2%
Average
|
45% 197 MB/s
|
64% 21.7 MB/s
|
134% 188 MB/s
|
|
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 32GB-$8
24GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 15 15 15 15 MB/s
|
9.9%
Terrible
|
23% 18.2 MB/s
|
65% 1.73 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1334 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
16.4%
Very poor
|
17% 5.87 GB/s
|
10% 3.53 GB/s
|
20% 198 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical EN Butterfly s Builds (Compare 3 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Packard EN Butterfly s
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |