Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4000 14,024 User benchmarks, average bench 24% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	29.6% Poor	Memory 41 1-Core 54.4 2-Core 104 38% 66.6 Pts	4-Core 106 8-Core 107 14% 106 Pts	64-Core 107 7% 107 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 1254) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.97% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 2.7 Parallax 2.3 3% 2.97 fps	MRender 3.6 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 3.6 3% 3.1 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.97% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB 41,519 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30001P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 123 87 70 71 66 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	Read 364 Write 94.8 Mixed 156 SusWrite 85.2 38% 175 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 55.9 4K Mixed 14.4 86% 31.8 MB/s	DQ Read 210 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 121 104% 154 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905711-007.A00G Hynix 8GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.7% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 6 18% 6.4 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 4 11% 3.73 GB/s	Latency 198 20% 198 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium Silver N5000IntelBench 34%, 12,140 samples	72x
Celeron N4000IntelBench 24%, 14,024 samples	62x
Celeron N4100IntelBench 33%, 6,492 samples	8x

GPU
UHD Graphics 605IntelBench 2%, 14,651 samples	72x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	71x

RAM
1x4GBHynixBench 19%, 8,928 samples	58x
1x4GBMicronBench 22%, 5,693 samples	28x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 40%, 38,499 samples	6x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16