Asus P5KPL-AM-CKD-VISUM-SI

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	61.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus P5KPL-AM-CKD-VISUM-SI (all builds)
Memory	1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100504
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 07 '17 at 17:45
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161 34,093 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.85 GHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	51.4% Above average	Memory 75.8 1-Core 40.7 2-Core 81.5 44% 66 Pts	4-Core 159 8-Core 159 21% 159 Pts	64-Core 160 10% 160 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85B6) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.33 Performing below potential (98^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (76 fps cap detected)	61.2% Good	Lighting 75.3 Reflection 76.6 Parallax 76.6 61% 76.2 fps	MRender 72.3 Gravity 71.5 Splatting 77.4 61% 73.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force LS 120GB-$98 9,315 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: S9FM02.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2357 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1212 (A2) Unknown 85 85 101 (AA) Unknown 100 100 220 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 4588370 (AE) Unknown 100 100 34 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 34 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 30 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 5701 (E7) Temperature 100 100 97 (F1) Unknown 100 100 3815 (F2) Unknown 100 100 7588	31.9% Below average	Read 233 Write 31.9 Mixed 116 28% 127 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 39.9 4K Mixed 4.27 68% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 32.6 DQ Write 56.8 DQ Mixed 5.21 15% 31.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 84%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44 40,147 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 30GB free Firmware: 1AC01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 93 93 2930 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 3864 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 10306 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 5919 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2860 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 51 454295579 (C2) HDA temperature 66 45 4866703394 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 23520 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 96 640 (C8) Write error rate 100 99 3 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	37.5% Below average	Read 62.8 Write 67.4 Mixed 27.5 39% 52.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.98 4K Mixed 0.36 96% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 62%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB 19,716 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 37GB free Firmware: 05.04C05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 198 0 (03) Spinup time 140 137 5975 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5141 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7742 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3560 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 359 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5141 (C2) HDA temperature 109 92 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	29.4% Poor	Read 50.3 Write 51.5 Mixed 30.8 33% 44.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.94 4K Mixed 0.24 81% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	21% Poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 5.9 19% 6.53 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 5.8 17% 6.07 GB/s	Latency 88.7 45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5KPL-AM-CKD-VISUM-SI Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-AM-CKD-VISUM-SI

CPU
Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $150Bench 45%, 18,432 samples	8x
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	6x
Core2 Duo E7400Intel $130Bench 38%, 14,354 samples	5x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	5x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	5x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	4x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
120GB 120GBSSDBench 59%, 4,995 samples	2x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	2x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	46x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	3x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $178

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16