| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 25% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 92.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP ZBook Studio x360 G5 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | HP 844F |
| Memory | 19.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190415 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 29 '21 at 13:22 |
| Run Duration | 137 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 18% |
PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E-2186M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
|
71.2%
Very good
|
78% 132 Pts
|
40% 308 Pts
|
21% 342 Pts
|
| Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel UHD Graphics P630
HP(103C 844F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8189
|
5.61%
Terrible
|
5% 17.1 fps
|
7% 7.93 fps
| |
|
Nvidia Quadro P2000
HP(103C 844F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1607 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25%
Poor
|
25% 32.9 fps
|
26% 31.5 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMA82GS7CJR8N-VK 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
66.5%
Good
|
69% 24 GB/s
|
46% 16.2 GB/s
|
63% 63.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical ZBook Studio x360 G5 Builds (Compare 428 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP ZBook Studio x360 G5
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples | 113x |
| Xeon E-2176MIntelBench 77%, 4,000 samples | 77x |
| Core i7-8850HIntelBench 71%, 20,669 samples | 58x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro P1000NvidiaBench 20%, 5,264 samples | 154x |
| UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples | 129x |
| Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 28%, 4,738 samples | 87x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |