MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 29 '21 at 02:33
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 6800-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
62.9% Good
Memory 61.9
1-Core 44.7
2-Core 162
49% 89.5 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 644
59% 493 Pts
64-Core 891
55% 891 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-XT-$650
Gigabyte(1458 232B) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 137
Parallax 404
97% 220 fps
MRender 342
Gravity 144
Splatting 242
197% 243 fps
Poor: 165%
This bench: 125%
Great: 178%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 120GB-$82
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 307 283 294 255 272 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 306
Write 320
Mixed 250
SusWrite 286
66% 290 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 41
4K Mixed 22.3
76% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 180
138% 188 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 98%
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15
111GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 342 116 69 64 64 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 441
Write 359
Mixed 353
SusWrite 167
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 27
4K Mixed 16.2
61% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 45.5
70% 132 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 86%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
145GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1371 387 388 388 389 389 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 1,668
Write 1,482
Mixed 1,229
SusWrite 552
276% 1,233 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 93.6
4K Mixed 35.9
146% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 589
DQ Write 424
DQ Mixed 555
402% 523 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 167%
Great: 302%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
238GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 124 126 127 127 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 67.7
Write 93.5
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 126
63% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.5
157% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 71%
Intenso Alu Line 8GB
7GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 9.3 9.1 9.3 9.3 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.53% Terrible
Read 18.7
Write 10.5
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 10.1
14% 11.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.53%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
80.7% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 28.3
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 24.3
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,649 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $963
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback