HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.44% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	74.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP Z620 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 158A
Memory	7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130701
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 28 '21 at 11:32
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1,642 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Memory 69.8 1-Core 89.1 2-Core 181 64% 113 Pts	4-Core 320 8-Core 654 57% 487 Pts	64-Core 1,690 105% 1,690 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000 13,526 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Nvidia(10DE 094C) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.09 Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	7.44% Terrible	Lighting 8.3 Reflection 10.6 Parallax 10.7 7% 9.87 fps	MRender 12.2 Gravity 10.8 Splatting 9.6 9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.44% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 243GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 368 366 365 368 366 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	Read 435 Write 370 Mixed 303 SusWrite 367 83% 369 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 64.3 4K Mixed 31.2 108% 39.2 MB/s	DQ Read 17.9 DQ Write 52.1 DQ Mixed 104 60% 58.1 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 129%
Transcend TS480GSSD220S 480GB 5,978 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 96GB free Firmware: 7B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 238 234 230 135 108 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.8% Average	Read 238 Write 222 Mixed 215 SusWrite 198 49% 218 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 37.5 4K Mixed 19.4 76% 25.8 MB/s	DQ Read 13.6 DQ Write 79.3 DQ Mixed 27.7 27% 40.2 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 450GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 97 95 100 99 99 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT8GC72C4NG0NL-CG 2x8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 2 of 12 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.4% Average	MC Read 18.7 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 15.7 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 6.8 24% 8.5 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,393 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	150x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	147x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	129x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	169x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	113x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	95x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	72x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	68x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	60x

RAM
9965525-138.A00LF 12x8GBKingstonBench 111%, 25 samples	24x
18JDF1G72PZ-1G6E1 8x8GBMicronBench 97%, 23 samples	20x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $345

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16