| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 1.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 23.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
| System | Samsung 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B |
| Memory | 0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit색, |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20111012 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 28 '21 at 09:44 |
| Run Duration | 121 Seconds |
| Run User | KOR-User |
| Background CPU | 80% |
| CPU Throttled | 99% |
PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
44.3%
Average
|
41% 63.3 Pts
|
8% 54.2 Pts
|
7% 109 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0B6) 1.8GB
Driver: Ver. 9.17.10.4459
|
1.95%
Terrible
|
2% 2.3 fps
|
2% 2.73 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
120gb SSD 120GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 57 52 39 81 MB/s
|
23.2%
Poor
|
22% 102 MB/s
|
27% 9.7 MB/s
|
25% 49.6 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5673FH0-CF8 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
|
38%
Below average
|
39% 13.6 GB/s
|
23% 8.07 GB/s
|
48% 83.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B Builds (Compare 292 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples | 64x |
| Core i5-2450MIntel $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples | 58x |
| Core i5-2430MIntel $53Bench 50%, 41,461 samples | 47x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 162x |
| HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples | 69x |
| GeForce GT 520MXNvidiaBench 2%, 1,577 samples | 40x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $228 |