Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210113
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 28 '21 at 02:46
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$201 128,080 User benchmarks, average bench 98% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	98.7% Outstanding	Memory 79.7 1-Core 165 2-Core 329 101% 191 Pts	4-Core 630 8-Core 1,060 103% 845 Pts	64-Core 1,580 98% 1,580 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 98.7% Great: 112%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 119E) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	100% Outstanding	Lighting 125 Reflection 136 Parallax 126 102% 129 fps	MRender 114 Gravity 129 Splatting 115 97% 119 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 110%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249 18,356 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 719GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 2,307 Write 1,521 Mixed 987 353% 1,605 MB/s	4K Read 52.8 4K Write 144 4K Mixed 73.5 250% 90.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1288 DQ Write 1,082 DQ Mixed 1,123 858% 1,164 MB/s
Poor: 168% Great: 363%
Amd-raid Array 1 1TB 421 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 911GB free Firmware: 9.3 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 9030 Write 66.2 Mixed 127 2,201% 3,074 MB/s	4K Read 728 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 8.1 31,324% 247 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 105%
Amd-raid Array 2 999GB 226 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 674GB free Firmware: 9.3 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 9,233 Write 66.8 Mixed 113 2,246% 3,138 MB/s	4K Read 731 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 4.9 31,062% 247 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 137%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BL16G36C16U4W.M8FB1 2x16GB 405 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75.4% Very good	MC Read 31.9 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 27.5 76% 26.5 GB/s	SC Read 25.4 SC Write 20.2 SC Mixed 29.6 72% 25.1 GB/s	Latency 81.1 49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 134%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,719 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 182%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 181%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

CPU
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $201Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,332x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,054x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $154Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	879x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	510x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	398x
RTX 3070-TiNvidia $600Bench 158%, 218,061 samples	361x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	438x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	382x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	205x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	157x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	124x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 101%, 32,191 samples	116x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $1,209

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16