Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4100 6,492 User benchmarks, average bench 33% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	38.3% Below average	Memory 45.2 1-Core 49.9 2-Core 95.5 37% 63.5 Pts	4-Core 181 8-Core 185 24% 183 Pts	64-Core 182 11% 182 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1854 0308) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.89% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 0.9 Parallax 2.4 2% 1.77 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 3.4 2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.89% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15 37,154 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 328 161 183 171 116 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	45.9% Average	Read 410 Write 8 Mixed 340 SusWrite 212 54% 243 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 11.9 4K Mixed 1 49% 13.5 MB/s	DQ Read 144 DQ Write 9.2 DQ Mixed 0.4 20% 51.2 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4SFS824A.M8FD 1x8GB 343 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.6% Poor	MC Read 8.3 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 9.4 25% 8.9 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 4.1 12% 4.03 GB/s	Latency 179 22% 179 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4100IntelBench 33%, 6,492 samples	27x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	27x

RAM
SF464128CK8IWGKFEG 1x4GBUnknownBench 35%, 653 samples	18x
1x8GBKingstonBench 32%, 3,554 samples	3x
SMS4TDC3C0K0446SCG 1x4GBUnknownBench 34%, 1,143 samples	3x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16