PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 33.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME Z390-A (all builds) |
Memory | 12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190318 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 27 '21 at 18:08 |
Run Duration | 189 Seconds |
Run User | NLD-User |
Background CPU | 9% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
93.1%
Outstanding
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
|
33.6%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
328GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 353 364 358 361 362 MB/s
|
121%
Outstanding
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
203GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 107 107 107 106 MB/s
|
72.9%
Very good
|
|||
USB DISK 2.0 4GB
1GB free, PID 3100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.4 MB/s
|
3.85%
Terrible
|
|||
WD Elements 25A3 8TB
7.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 202 196 196 194 198 MB/s
|
100%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD My Book 1TB
253GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 23 22 22 MB/s
|
16.3%
Very poor
|
|||
WD My Book 1230 3TB
821GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 20 17 19 20 MB/s
|
16.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS8G4D30BESBK.8FD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
77.5%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 9,167x |
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 6,195x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 4,126x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 1,960x |
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 1,884x |
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples | 1,603x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 98% - Outstanding | Total price: $978 |