Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics46.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJan 27 '21 at 15:40
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 53%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 74.5
1-Core 86.8
2-Core 134
60% 98.6 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 442
41% 341 Pts
64-Core 489
30% 489 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.8% Average
Lighting 61.6
Reflection 59.4
Parallax 60.9
50% 60.6 fps
MRender 40.2
Gravity 66.6
Splatting 42.1
40% 49.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 374 318 227 255 313 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 299
Write 215
Mixed 224
SusWrite 299
58% 259 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 28.9
4K Mixed 18.4
50% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 327
251% 341 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 124%
WDC WDS100T2B0A 1TB
894GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 392 364 264 269 326 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 355
Write 335
Mixed 309
SusWrite 323
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 51.6
4K Mixed 26.3
90% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 279
229% 326 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 121%
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
111GB free
Firmware: UE300000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 90 89 88 89 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 346
Write 240
Mixed 235
SusWrite 115
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 18.7
4K Mixed 11.3
45% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 92.5
DQ Mixed 42.5
49% 84.7 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 53%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
879GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 179 179 176 177 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 178
Mixed 102
SusWrite 177
118% 160 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 104%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$51
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
64.4% Good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 20.7
70% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 10
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,308 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $750
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback