Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	52.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte A320M-S2H V2
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF (all builds)
Memory	3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191202
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 27 '21 at 14:58
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75 104,122 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	51.5% Above average	Memory 57.3 1-Core 69.7 2-Core 140 51% 89 Pts	4-Core 264 8-Core 264 35% 264 Pts	64-Core 256 16% 256 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% EVGA(3842 6333) 2GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	15% Very poor	Lighting 18.6 Reflection 19.1 Parallax 19.2 15% 19 fps	MRender 16.2 Gravity 19.8 Splatting 17.5 15% 17.8 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84 21,990 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z3311000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 58 54 51 70 45 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	52.8% Above average	Read 469 Write 367 Mixed 257 SusWrite 64.7 64% 290 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 40.4 4K Mixed 19.5 71% 25.3 MB/s	DQ Read 132 DQ Write 243 DQ Mixed 17.1 61% 131 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 71%
WD WDS120G1G0A-00SS50 1TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 232GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 128 128 127 128 126 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive		Read 130 Write 130 Mixed 75 SusWrite 127 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 81%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12 26,708 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 21GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 5.3 3.7 18 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	8.5% Terrible	Read 27.7 Write 7.2 Mixed 10.7 SusWrite 9.2 15% 13.7 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.8 59% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.5% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 1x8GB 14,156 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	42.5% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 14.3 43% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 13.5 SC Mixed 14 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 136 29% 136 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF Builds (Compare 1,522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	213x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	190x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	159x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	112x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	98x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	85x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	79x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	41x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	31x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	45x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	32x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	30x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 90% - Excellent

Total price: $287

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16